ID:          Page 22
Subject:     Summary
Comments:    In each of the cases presented here
             1.  the court heard at least two PSYCHIATRISTS, found the testator to be competent,
                 but still voided the will on the grounds of undue influence.
             2.  Undue influence was found even though the wills were (implicitly) witnessed.
                 The testimony of ATTESTING WITNESSES isn't even mentioned.